The gamma
parameter in XGBoost controls the minimum loss reduction required for a split to occur in a leaf node.
An alias for the gamma
parameter is min_split_loss
.
It acts as a regularization term that helps control the model’s complexity. Higher values of gamma
make the algorithm more conservative, requiring a larger reduction in the loss function to create a new split. This can help prevent overfitting by limiting the model’s sensitivity to individual data points.
This example demonstrates how to tune the gamma
hyperparameter using grid search with cross-validation to find the optimal value that balances model complexity and performance.
import xgboost as xgb
import numpy as np
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV, StratifiedKFold
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
# Create a synthetic dataset
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_classes=3, n_features=20, n_informative=10, random_state=42)
# Configure cross-validation
cv = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
# Define hyperparameter grid
param_grid = {
'gamma': [0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0]
}
# Set up XGBoost classifier
model = xgb.XGBClassifier(n_estimators=100, learning_rate=0.1, random_state=42)
# Perform grid search
grid_search = GridSearchCV(estimator=model, param_grid=param_grid, cv=cv, scoring='accuracy', n_jobs=-1, verbose=1)
grid_search.fit(X, y)
# Get results
print(f"Best gamma: {grid_search.best_params_['gamma']}")
print(f"Best CV accuracy: {grid_search.best_score_:.4f}")
# Plot gamma vs. accuracy
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
results = grid_search.cv_results_
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.plot(param_grid['gamma'], results['mean_test_score'], marker='o', linestyle='-', color='b')
plt.fill_between(param_grid['gamma'], results['mean_test_score'] - results['std_test_score'],
results['mean_test_score'] + results['std_test_score'], alpha=0.1, color='b')
plt.title('Gamma vs. Accuracy')
plt.xlabel('Gamma')
plt.ylabel('CV Average Accuracy')
plt.grid(True)
plt.show()
The resulting plot may look as follows:
In this example, we create a synthetic multiclass classification dataset using scikit-learn’s make_classification
function. We then set up a StratifiedKFold
cross-validation object to ensure that the class distribution is preserved in each fold.
We define a hyperparameter grid param_grid
that specifies the range of gamma
values we want to test. In this case, we consider values from 0 to 1.0 in increments of 0.1.
We create an instance of the XGBClassifier
with some basic hyperparameters set, such as n_estimators
and learning_rate
. We then perform the grid search using GridSearchCV
, providing the model, parameter grid, cross-validation object, scoring metric (accuracy), and the number of CPU cores to use for parallel computation.
After fitting the grid search object with grid_search.fit(X, y)
, we can access the best gamma
value and the corresponding best cross-validation accuracy using grid_search.best_params_
and grid_search.best_score_
, respectively.
Finally, we plot the relationship between the gamma
values and the cross-validation average accuracy scores using matplotlib. We retrieve the results from grid_search.cv_results_
and plot the mean accuracy scores along with the standard deviation as error bars. This visualization helps us understand how the choice of gamma
affects the model’s performance and guides us in selecting an appropriate value.
By tuning the gamma
hyperparameter using grid search with cross-validation, we can find the optimal value that balances the model’s complexity and performance. This helps prevent overfitting and ensures that the model generalizes well to unseen data.